Page 1 |
Previous | 1 of 7 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large
Extra Large
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
All (PDF)
|
This page
All
|
838 _-/ AGRTCULTUNE \ i.*, WIVERSITY nv. s. DEPARTMENT-{F g,// cl*n*ry*, mCU!!CARI nnt IEST r- 1961 -62 INITT,At REPORT an estlnate of bow fat the bulls are. Bacb bull 9pq,,g,tql.Sln Sgo.re: thle value le wsg scomondltLon" at tbe t. t 81 ,l',lb xvlT,qq 0q4 Eulle were brought to the lucrncart Bull teatlng Statlon on October 9, 1961, for the 1961-62 teetl A rotal of L28 bulle, sepresentlog four breede were Put on te!t. After a ttro-lreek adjustnent perlod ou a blgh roughage rattoo, the bulle rere wefghed and graded foi tbe tntltal teet lnforustl.on. thle report contaln8 all tbe lafomatlin collected upoo arri.vel at the rtatlon end after tbe two-week edtuetnent perlod. Explanatlon of lGaeure@ntt Grlrde: A coaformetlon grade-was eetloated for each bull oo th6 arrlval date, 6[ifi!. 9, and agaln on-October 23. ttro grader8 were uaed oa October 9 aad tbree on OctobeiZ3. Ibe grade eborm on ibe Brmary eheet 11 an average of the ; oplnlooe of, theae gradere. t}e fol,lqflng staodards were used: Faacy plus 17 Outetandlng ln etrong showring coqetltl'on Fancy 16 Excelleat breeding tYPe f.".it nl.nug 15 Show well Lo ltrong aborrlng coupetl'tlon Chotee plue L4 lbe beet of range bulle Cholce 13 lttll lryrove uost raoge cattle Cholce mlnug 12 Sattefectory range bu1le Good ptua 11 l4rove plaher range eattle Good 10 Good mlnus 9 Xteee gradea rePrese1t a vleual appral'ea[-of the conforoetloo, tSret lod queltty of IUe bulls. lble grade eFoufa S fudependent of how fat the bulle ere. tior"rner, lt Le reellzed thet condfffir-anouot of flltr Btate of bealth, aod nany other ttlog" do affect scofe tn aplte of att effortg to avold lt' . Aootber factor which detraets froo the value of tbeee acores La the faet tbet tro tno gradere wt[l score bulls exactly allke all the way dolrn th€ llne. Sornetleg gridera dtffer ln thelr ldeal. Otbers oay have tbe -sane ldeaLr but oue grader oay grade eoneisteotly hlgher or-lolwer tbaa the other' Ibe aane slt-uat{ os exLors ii eholalng J"dgh! wbEn tbe llne-up changee at dlffirrent ehmts and under dlffereat Judgea. -gven the saae E8o gradlag a large nrnber of cattle on tnro eonsecutlve i.yE t not llkely to grade all of, tbeo tbe aame on botb days. lfe cao call thea" itff"t"oces tthGan eirortt. At preeent, tbere Ls no better way to oessure coaformatlon tbao by vleual appralaal; but let's remember tbst thls EeaBureoent hag sone bunaD error ln lt, aoa fs not an abeolute oeaaureoent of tbe eal,ual. Bbe surmary eheet are averageg of followlng etandardg were used: satse tlne he we8 graded. rhe flguree showD on tle estimateg by the dlffereot gradele. The 5 Fat3 extenslve graln f,eedlng. 4 ltoderately fat; sooe grala feedlng. 3 Good ftesl; etntlrr to uttt fat calvee cml'ng of,f good pasture' 2 Sllghtly tUtn; tbrl.fty, yet below averege for weaDlng calvee off good pagture. I Ttrtn; unthrlfty or undernourlehed.
Object Description
Title | Tucumcari Bull Test, 1961-62, Initial report |
Series Designation | Tucumcari Bull Test, 1961-62 |
Description | Initial report of the 1961-62 Tucumcari Bull Test, including information on the test schedule and beginning data on the bulls involved in the test. |
Subject | Cattle--Breeding; cattle (NAL); breeding (NAL); Bulls--Growth; bulls (NAL); animal growth (NAL); Bulls--Selection; selection methods (NAL); |
Date Original | 1961-10-23 |
Digital Publisher | New Mexico State University Library |
Rights | Copyright, NMSU Board of Regents. |
Collection | NMSU Cooperative Extension Service and Agricultural Experiment Station Publications |
Digital Identifier | UAAPtbt19611023.pdf |
Source | J 87 .N6 X313.99 B93 |
Type | Text |
Format | application/pdf |
Language | eng |
Page Description
Title | Page 1 |
Series Designation | Tucumcari Bull Test, 1961-62 |
Subject | Cattle--Breeding; cattle (NAL); breeding (NAL); Bulls--Growth; bulls (NAL); animal growth (NAL); Bulls--Selection; selection methods (NAL); |
Date Original | 1961-10-23 |
Digital Publisher | New Mexico State University Library |
Rights | Copyright, NMSU Board of Regents. |
Collection | NMSU Cooperative Extension Service and Agricultural Experiment Station Publications |
Is Part Of | Tucumcari Bull Test, 1961-62, Initial report |
Source | J 87 .N6 X313.99 B93 |
Type | Text |
Format | application/pdf |
Language | eng |
OCR | 838 _-/ AGRTCULTUNE \ i.*, WIVERSITY nv. s. DEPARTMENT-{F g,// cl*n*ry*, mCU!!CARI nnt IEST r- 1961 -62 INITT,At REPORT an estlnate of bow fat the bulls are. Bacb bull 9pq,,g,tql.Sln Sgo.re: thle value le wsg scomondltLon" at tbe t. t 81 ,l',lb xvlT,qq 0q4 Eulle were brought to the lucrncart Bull teatlng Statlon on October 9, 1961, for the 1961-62 teetl A rotal of L28 bulle, sepresentlog four breede were Put on te!t. After a ttro-lreek adjustnent perlod ou a blgh roughage rattoo, the bulle rere wefghed and graded foi tbe tntltal teet lnforustl.on. thle report contaln8 all tbe lafomatlin collected upoo arri.vel at the rtatlon end after tbe two-week edtuetnent perlod. Explanatlon of lGaeure@ntt Grlrde: A coaformetlon grade-was eetloated for each bull oo th6 arrlval date, 6[ifi!. 9, and agaln on-October 23. ttro grader8 were uaed oa October 9 aad tbree on OctobeiZ3. Ibe grade eborm on ibe Brmary eheet 11 an average of the ; oplnlooe of, theae gradere. t}e fol,lqflng staodards were used: Faacy plus 17 Outetandlng ln etrong showring coqetltl'on Fancy 16 Excelleat breeding tYPe f.".it nl.nug 15 Show well Lo ltrong aborrlng coupetl'tlon Chotee plue L4 lbe beet of range bulle Cholce 13 lttll lryrove uost raoge cattle Cholce mlnug 12 Sattefectory range bu1le Good ptua 11 l4rove plaher range eattle Good 10 Good mlnus 9 Xteee gradea rePrese1t a vleual appral'ea[-of the conforoetloo, tSret lod queltty of IUe bulls. lble grade eFoufa S fudependent of how fat the bulle ere. tior"rner, lt Le reellzed thet condfffir-anouot of flltr Btate of bealth, aod nany other ttlog" do affect scofe tn aplte of att effortg to avold lt' . Aootber factor which detraets froo the value of tbeee acores La the faet tbet tro tno gradere wt[l score bulls exactly allke all the way dolrn th€ llne. Sornetleg gridera dtffer ln thelr ldeal. Otbers oay have tbe -sane ldeaLr but oue grader oay grade eoneisteotly hlgher or-lolwer tbaa the other' Ibe aane slt-uat{ os exLors ii eholalng J"dgh! wbEn tbe llne-up changee at dlffirrent ehmts and under dlffereat Judgea. -gven the saae E8o gradlag a large nrnber of cattle on tnro eonsecutlve i.yE t not llkely to grade all of, tbeo tbe aame on botb days. lfe cao call thea" itff"t"oces tthGan eirortt. At preeent, tbere Ls no better way to oessure coaformatlon tbao by vleual appralaal; but let's remember tbst thls EeaBureoent hag sone bunaD error ln lt, aoa fs not an abeolute oeaaureoent of tbe eal,ual. Bbe surmary eheet are averageg of followlng etandardg were used: satse tlne he we8 graded. rhe flguree showD on tle estimateg by the dlffereot gradele. The 5 Fat3 extenslve graln f,eedlng. 4 ltoderately fat; sooe grala feedlng. 3 Good ftesl; etntlrr to uttt fat calvee cml'ng of,f good pasture' 2 Sllghtly tUtn; tbrl.fty, yet below averege for weaDlng calvee off good pagture. I Ttrtn; unthrlfty or undernourlehed. |