•
;~St; 1n I.
D. Lr) Far:ners ""soc.
to I"'''et proctssors ' uct1..<l! ~ ",t.is .
milk.
FALL FRESHENI NG PAYS DIVIDENDS
It was quite evident a t
the recent hearing on amend ing
the Rio Grande milk
marketing order that many
producers ' groups are interested
in Class I sales
in their marketing area .
Considerable time was spent
in d i sc us s in g proposed
amendments to the order .
The Bilk Market Administrator
' s office presented
statistical informati on on
pr oduction, prices, and
utilization of milk since
the order has been in effect .
This past SUlTlller the uniform
or blend price I.as
$4,)7 per 100 pounds during
June with a 64X Class T
util ization increased to
" t 9~',IJith a cocn,'spc'tlld -
Stem' t,lie5 \"er-" short and
itf~cul) ~n !;ecuring '~ilk lr0m ou t side the sta te
Add i t i or.al expe ns e ~as invo lved in bringing in this
The above graph has be;:n prepared, using the amounts of Cl<lsS I and Class II milk
aCLually us ed daily in th" ~ar ke t. Daily utilization in July 1962 W<lS about 899,000
pounds compared with 987, 0:'.1 pounds in September, which is an increase of about 107. .
Daily utilization in July 1963 \~as about 938,000 with an increase to over 1,000 ,000 i n
September, which is an increase o f about 10%, This would emphasize the need of shifting
SOUle of the summer prodcc ti:1Il to Se pteC'lber and October when the market needs it.
TIle time to start pl ~:1 n ing for production next fall is now. It is difficult to
change your entire breeding program, especially if a uniform calvi.ng schedule has been
( ollowed .
I'ubl." •• d .nd d, .. rib ul,..j ,n f""h ... ..ce of ,h~ ,\ <u of CO"l:r~ .. of May /I ."d J 'one '0. 1914,
by ,h. A",;cult",o! £ .... ·''';on S."ic< "I N .... M p~;co SlOt. Un;~ .... "y. Philip L.,..nd""h"
d"octo •. • ~d'h . U.S. O<I' ..... "l<n' of A",ieuh" .. ,c<><>p .... ,.;nlf.
The monthly report of the Dairy Herd Improvement Association (DHIA) was initiated by E.E. Anderson, Extension Dairyman in the 1940s. From the 1960s forward a cooperative report had been prepared jointly by staff members of the NMSU Dairy Department, Agricultural Engineering, Agronomy, Veterinary and sent primarily to dairy herds on test (OS, DHIA, DHIR), County Extension Agents, and Instructors of Vocational Agriculture. The publication of the DHIA report was overseen by Philip Leyendecker, a director of the NMSU Agricultural Extension Service in cooperation with U.S. Department of Agriculture. The title of the report had changed over time; it had a couple of variations, New Mexico Dairy Herd Improvement and Dairy Improvement Notes. This digital collection includes historical issues published between 1961 and 1980.